User agent detail

MQQBrowser/44 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5ATT; CPU iPhone OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11A465 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 4.4iOS 7.0Webkit 537.51.1AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 44closeiOS 7.0SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 44WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 5smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 7.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 44closeiOS 7.0closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 44WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.4Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:35 | by ThaDafinser