User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Firefox 42.0Win10 10.042.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 42.0Gecko 42.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 42.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 42.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 42.0Gecko Windows 10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 42.0closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 42.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 42.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 42.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 42.0Gecko 42.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 42.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:35 | by ThaDafinser