User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Opera Mini/7.1.32052/30.3697; ru; Oysters_T72HRi_3G) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.1.494 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.5Android 4.0unknown OystersT72HRi 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 Android 4.0OystersT72HRi 3GTabletyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto GNU/Linux OystersGT-S7250Dtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.494 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.049 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:35 | by ThaDafinser