User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; MP7007 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.116 Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1437.74904
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Opera 21.0.1437.74904Android 4.1.1Blink MpmanMP7007tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 21.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 21.0.1437.74904closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 21.0.1437.74904closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 21.0Blink Android 4.1MpmanMP7007tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 21.0.1437.74904closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 21.0.1437closeAndroid 4.1.1MpmanMP7007closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 21.0.1437.74904WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 21.0Blink Android 4.1.1MpmanMP7007tabletyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 21.0.1437.74904closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:34 | by ThaDafinser