User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1; m2 note) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/33.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 baidubrowser/5.3.4.0 (Baidu; P1 4.3.1) tieba/6.7.2 BMW
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/phablet.yml
Baidu Browser 5.3.4.0Android 5.1WebKit MeizuM2 Notephablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.42404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Baidu Browser 5.3WebKit Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notephabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.0closeAndroid 5.1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 5.3.4.0Blink Android 5.1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.041 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 5.1closeAndroid 5.1MeizuM2 NoteSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:33 | by ThaDafinser