User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Cyclone Voyager 2 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.82 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 30.0.1599.82Android 4.2.2Blink SumvisionCyclone Voyager 2tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2SumvisionCyclone Voyager 2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.2.2Cyclone Voyager 2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.82WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.2.2SumvisionCyclone Voyager 2tabletyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:33 | by ThaDafinser