User agent detail

LG-C2000 UP.Browser/6.2.3 (GUI) MMP/1.0 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGC2000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGC2000Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-C2000 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3close LGC2000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGC2000smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LGC2000closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3 LGLGC2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGC2000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGC2000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:33 | by ThaDafinser