User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/537.6 Midori/0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.4Windows VistaWebkit 537.6desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.07601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.4closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.4WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.4closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.4WebKit 537.6Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.4Webkit 537.6Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:33 | by ThaDafinser