User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; ja-jp; EBRD1102; EXT) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/ereader/sony.yaml
Webkit 533.1SonyPRS-G1 Readerereaderyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 4.0closeLinux SonyPRST1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 4.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.1 SonyPRS-G1 Readerereaderyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 4.0closeLinux SonyPRST1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:33 | by ThaDafinser