User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (FreeBSD; U; Panasonic; en-00) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera DTV/2.225 (Panasonic, TH-L--E5M, ) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Webkit 535.1PanasonicVieratelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 14.0WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicSGH-P220smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 14.0.835closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202WebKit 535.1FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 535.1 PanasonicVieratelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:32 | by ThaDafinser