User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/6.0; ARM; Touch; WPDesktop)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
IEMobile 10.0WinPhone8 8.06.0 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 10.0Trident 6.0WinPhone8 8.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows 8tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 10.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone 8.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:32 | by ThaDafinser