User agent detail

Mozilla/3.01Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.32 i486)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 3.0Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 3.01GoldcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.0.32closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 3 Gold 3.01Gold Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1 Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:32 | by ThaDafinser