User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) rekonq Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
rekonq 0.0Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
rekonq WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Rekonq closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Rekonq WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Rekonq closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
rekonq closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Rekonq WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
rekonq Webkit 534.34Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:32 | by ThaDafinser