User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/534.6 TouchPad/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HPTouchPad Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux HPTouchPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux HPTouchPadcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.6Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.6Linux closeclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:31 | by ThaDafinser