User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; ru-ru; W200 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 ACHEETAHI/2100501010
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
CM Browser 0.0Android 4.2unknown ThLW200Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CM Browser WebKit Android 4.2ThLW200Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1ThLW200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.1closeAndroid 4.2.1ThlW200closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.1Cherry MobileW200mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.2ThLW200Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:30 | by ThaDafinser