User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.1; En-US; IBall Slide I7011 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, Like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.0.321 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
iBallSlide I7011 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.321closeAndroid 2.3.1GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 2.3iBallSlide I7011tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0closeAndroid 2.3.1iBallSlide I7011closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.321WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.1iBallSlide i7011tabletyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:30 | by ThaDafinser