User agent detail

HTC-F5151/1.0 Mozilla/5.0 (BMP; U; en) AppleWebKit/530.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) OBIGO/W10 Safari/530.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCF5151 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 530.8close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo W10WebKit Brew HTCF5151smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 10closeBrew MP HTCF5151closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo W10 Browser W10WebKit 530.8 HTC F5151closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo W 10Webkit 530.8Brew MP HTCF5151mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCF5151Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:30 | by ThaDafinser