User agent detail

Mozilla/6.0 (Macintosh; U; Amiga-AWeb) Safari 3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Amiga Aweb AmigaOS desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AWeb closeMacOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Amiga Aweb AmigaOS desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AWeb MacOS desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:30 | by ThaDafinser