User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-cn; MI 2S Build/JRO03L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/5.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1XiaomiMI 2Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.29703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit Android 4.1XiaomiMI 2Ssmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0closeAndroid 4.1.1XiaoMiMI 2Scloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 537.36Android 4.1.1XiaomiMi 2Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1XiaomiMI 2SSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:29 | by ThaDafinser