User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Mandriva Linux/1.9.2.13-0.1mdv2010.1 (2010.1) Firefox/3.6.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.13Mandriva 2010Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.058 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Mandriva 1.9desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.13closeMandriva 2010.1closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.119 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.13Gecko 20101209Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.13Gecko 1.9.2Mandriva 2010desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:29 | by ThaDafinser