User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS armv7l 7520.42.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/47.0.2526.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome 47Chrome OS Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 47.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.13801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 47.0Blink Chrome OS 7520.42desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeChrome OS 47.0.2526.59closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 47.0.2526closeChrome OS 7520.42.0closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeChrome OS 7520.42.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 47.0.2526.59WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 47Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:29 | by ThaDafinser