User agent detail

Nokia6208c/2.0 (04.50) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 nokia6208c/UC Browser8.0.3.107/69/444 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6208c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.0WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia6208c 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 8.0.3.107closeSeries40 Nokia6208 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.0 Symbian Nokia6208csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.0.3close Nokia6208ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.0.3.107 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6208ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.0Gecko Series40 Nokia6208 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6208 classicFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.09501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:27 | by ThaDafinser