User agent detail

User-Agent: igmHttp/0.1.501 (Android OS; HTCDesireHDA9191 ; 2.3.5; de_DE; 800x480) gzip
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesireHDA9191 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneric CrawlerBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
User-Agent closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCDesiremobile-browseryescloseclose0.246 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCDesireHDA9191smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCDesireHDA9191closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC Desire HDcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android HTCDesiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:27 | by ThaDafinser