User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Amazon Jem Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonJem Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.4AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFitabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.4.2AmazonJemcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.4.2AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9"tabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:26 | by ThaDafinser