User agent detail

New-Sogou-Spider/1.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-225.php
yesSogou SpiderBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSogou SpiderBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesSogou SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNew-Sogou-Spiderclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sogou "Search Dog" Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:26 | by ThaDafinser