User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; Build/LRX22G) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.81 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 5.0unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.81closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.81closeAndroid 5.0.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 5.0tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.81closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 5.0.2closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.81WebKit 537.36Android 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 5.0.2tabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.81closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 5.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:25 | by ThaDafinser