User agent detail

AdsBot-Google-Mobile (+http://www.google.com/mobile/adsbot.html) Mozilla (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3 0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-516.php
yesAdsBot Google-MobileBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAdsBot Google-MobileBot/Crawler0.07301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AdsBot-Google-Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAdsBot-Googleclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 3AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Ads Botclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:24 | by ThaDafinser