User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LG-E410f Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE410f Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.2LGE410Fmobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.1LGE410fsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.1.2LGE410fcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2LGLGE410fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.1.2LGOptimus L1 IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.1LGE410FFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:24 | by ThaDafinser