User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BREW; U; BREW 3.1.5; xx) AppleWebKit/525.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Polaris/7.0 Safari/525.26 480X800 LGE VX11000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
Polaris 7.0Brew 3.1.5Webkit 525.26LGEnv Touchmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 7.0closeJVM LGVX 11000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Polaris 7.0WebKit Brew 3.1LGVX11000smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 7.0closeBREW 3.1.5LGVX11000closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 525.26a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 7.0Webkit 525.26Brew 3.1.5LGEnv Touchmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux LGVX 11000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:24 | by ThaDafinser