User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.83 Safari/537.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Chrome 21.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 21.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 21.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 21.0.1180closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.83WebKit 537.1Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 21Webkit 537.1Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:24 | by ThaDafinser