User agent detail

samsung-gt-s5620/UC Browser8.0.3.107/69/444 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
UC Browser 8.0unknown unknownunknown SamsungS5620 MonteMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.0WebKit SamsungS5620 MonteMobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-gt-s5620 UCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 8.0.3.107closeTouchwiz SamsungMontemobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.0 Samsunggt-s5620smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.0.3close Samsunggt-s5620closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.0.3.107 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.0Gecko Touchwiz SamsungMontemobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:22 | by ThaDafinser