User agent detail

MOT-EX132/1.0 REXL4/1.0 BrewMP/1.0.3 Release/6.15.2011 Browser/NetFront/3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaEX132 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-EX132 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM MotorolaMOT-EX132mobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront Brew MotorolaEX132smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close MotorolaEX132closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.173 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.363 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 Brew MP 1.0.3MotorolaEX132mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaMOT-EX132Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:22 | by ThaDafinser