User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; GTB6; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 7.0Windows VistaTrident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.381 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:22 | by ThaDafinser