User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; en_us) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.112 Ninesky/1.8.0 Safari/535.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-ninesky.yaml
NineSky 1.8.0Android Webkit 535.1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 13.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.22902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 13.0.782.112closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 13.0.782.112closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 13.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 13.0.782.112closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 13.0.782closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 13.0.782.112closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 13.0.782.112WebKit 535.1Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.472 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NineSky 1.8.0Webkit 535.1Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 13.0.782.112closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeMac OS X 10.7.1Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:22 | by ThaDafinser