User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (en-us) AppleWebKit/537.36(KHTML, like Gecko; Google-Adwords-DisplayAds-WebRender;) Chrome/27.0.1453Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesGoogle Adwords DisplayAds WebRenderBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Adwords DisplayAds WebRenderBot/Crawler0.16702 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453Safaricloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453Safariclose desktop-browsercloseclose0.267 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453Safariclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453Safariclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453SafariWebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebRender Blink desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:21 | by ThaDafinser