User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Safari/537.36 LBBROWSER
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Liebao Windows XPWebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.09301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Liebao WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LB Browser WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LieBao Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:21 | by ThaDafinser