User agent detail

MOT-V360v/08.B7.58R MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
MotorolaV360feature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV360vMobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V360v 08.B7.58Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close MotorolaV360mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaV360feature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV360vcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V360vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV360vmobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaV360Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:21 | by ThaDafinser