User agent detail

SonyEricssonF500i/R1A SEMC-Browser/4.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonF500i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC 4.0 SymbianOS SonyEricssonF500iMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonF500i R1Acloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SEMC Browser 4.0closeJVM SonyEricssonF500imobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SEMC-Browser 4.0 Sony EricssonF500ismartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
SEMC-Browser 4.0close SonyEricssonF500icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SEMC-Browser 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson F500icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SEMC Browser 4.0 Sony EricssonF500imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonF500iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:20 | by ThaDafinser