User agent detail

Mozilla/5,0(Linux;U;Android4.0.4;en-us;LG-MS770Build/IMM76I)AppleWebKit/534.30(KHTML,like Gecko)Version/4.0MobileSafari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGMS770 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 4.0MobileSafaricloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.287 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android LGMS770Buildsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid LGMS770closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0MobileSafariWebKit 534.30Android LGLG Motion 4G (MS770)closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4LGMotion 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:20 | by ThaDafinser