User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; NaviPad TM-7855 3G Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 32.0.1700.99Android 4.2.2Blink teXetNaviPad TM-7855 3Gtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.364 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2teXetNaviPad TM-7855 3Gtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.2.2NaviPad TM-7855 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.094 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36iOS AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.2.2teXetNaviPad TM-7855tabletyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:20 | by ThaDafinser