User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (hp-desktop; Linux; hpwOS/2.0; U; xx) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) wOSBrowser/234.83 Safari/534.6 Desktop/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-webos.yaml
webOS Browser webOS 2.0Webkit 534.6emulator Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
wOSBrowser 234.83closewebOS 2.0HPTouchPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
wOSBrowser 2.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
webOS Browser 2.0closewebOS 2.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.163 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebOS Browser 234.83WebKit 534.6HP webOS 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
webOS Browser Webkit 534.6webOS 2.0emulatorcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux HPTouchPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:19 | by ThaDafinser