User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-CN; Lenovo A288t Build/MocorDroid2.3.5) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.7.6.428 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
UC Browser 9.7.6.428MocorDroid 2.3.5WebKit LenovoA288tsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.7U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA288tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.7WebKit MocorDroid 2.3LenovoA288tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.6closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA288tcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.39 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.7.6.428WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.474 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.7Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5LenovoA288mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:19 | by ThaDafinser