User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3xx/96.B0.0FR BER2.2 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; 11073256) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera 8.00 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Opera Mini MotorolaRAZRV3xxmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 8.00Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.00close desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.00Presto MotorolaRAZRV3xxsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.0close MotorolaRAZRV3xxcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.0 DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini MotorolaRAZRV3xxmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xxFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:19 | by ThaDafinser