User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LG-D802 Build/KOT49I.D80220h) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 MxBrowser/4.5.0.2000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-maxthon.yaml
Maxthon 4.5.0.2000Android 4.4.2Blink 537.36LGG2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4LGG2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD802mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 4.5WebKit Android 4.4LGD802smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD802closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLGD802closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 4.5.0.2000Blink Android 4.4.2LGG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4LGD802Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:18 | by ThaDafinser