User agent detail

SonyEricssonW666i/R2BA Java/SEMC-Java/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW666i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonW666i R2BAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonW666imobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java Sony EricssonW666ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonW666icloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W666icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonW666imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:17 | by ThaDafinser