User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Spyglass 3.0; OpenTV) Gecko/20081010 InettvBrowser/1.0 (F00001;OTV-IB24L;2.4;00000),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Generic_InettvOTV-IB24L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.22 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close OTV-IB24Lcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 1.0Gecko 20081010 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Spyglass 3.0Gecko OpenTVtelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:17 | by ThaDafinser