User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-176.php
Firefox 27.0Win7 6.127.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 27.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 27.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 27.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 27.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 27.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 27.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 27.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 27.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 27.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:16 | by ThaDafinser