User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-LA; SonyEricssonCK15i) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.342 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
UC Browser 9.4.0.342 Sony Ericssontxt profeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Sony Ericssontxt profeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0close SonyEricssonCK15icloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.0.342 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson CK15icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Sony Ericssontxt Promobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close SonyEricssonCK15iFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:16 | by ThaDafinser