User agent detail

lg-t325/UC Browser7.9.0.102/69/352 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGt325 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
lg-t325 UCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.102close LGt325mobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 LGt325smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0close LGt325closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.102 LGLGt325closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Gecko LGt325mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:16 | by ThaDafinser