User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; HTC Velocity 4G Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCVelocity 4G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCVelocity 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0HTCVelocity 4Gsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCVelocity 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.3HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.3HTCVelocity 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0HTCVelocity 4GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.09301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:15 | by ThaDafinser